Mozart and “Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star”
Mozart Variations of “Ah! vous dirai-je maman” for Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star
“Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star” is a poem sung to the tune of the French melody “Ah! vous dirai-je, Maman”, which was published in 1761 and later arranged by composer Wolfgang A. Mozart for his famous “12 Variations on “Ah! vous dirai-je, Maman, K265/300e.
It is a common misconception that Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart wrote “Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star.” He did not, as many of us believed or were made to believe whilst playing it for our piano lessons as children that Wolfgang Mozart composed it. Mozart was a child of five when the original French folk song was composed under the title of “Ah! vous dirai-je, Maman”, in 1761. Literally, or in context, the English translation would mean something like “Oh, would I tell you, mom?”, “Will I tell you, mom?”, or “Should I tell you, mom?”. The music first appeared (without words) in “Les Amusements d’une Heure et Demy” by Mr. Bouin in Paris.
However, Mozart composed a series of variations on this melody when he was older. Amongst my CD collection of Mozart music is Mozart, with 12 Variations “Ah, vous dirai-je, Maman,” K265, performed by Andras Schiff on the piano under Decca Record label, 1988.
Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star – an English Nursery Rhyme
“Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” is a popular English nursery rhymes. The lyrics are from an early nineteenth-century English poem, “The Star” written by Jane Taylor. The poem is in couplet form, first published in 1806 in Rhymes for the Nursery, a collection of poems by Taylor and her sister, Ann.
Ah! Vous Dirai-je Maman and Mozart’s 12 Variations, K. 265/300e
For a time, the composition date of Mozart’s Variations were thought to have been composed in 1778, whilst Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, aged 22, stayed in Paris from April to September in that year, the assumption being that the melody of a French song could only have been picked up by him whilst residing in France. For this presumed composition date, in the chronological catalogue of his compositions, Mozart’s 12 Variations of Ah! vous dirai-je Maman was renumbered from K.265 to K.300e. A later analysis of Mozart’s manuscript of the composition by Wolfgang Plath indicated 1781-1782 as the probable composition date.
Related Article: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Biography
Aika Dan Plays Mozart’s ‘Ah,vous dirai-je, maman’ K.265
YouTube Video Credit:
Aika Dan Mozart ‘Ah,vous dirai-je, maman’ K.265, uploaded by 1989piano. Accessed September 11, 2009.
Resources:
- Neue Mozart-Ausgabe, IX/26: Variationen für Klavier, Kritischer Bericht (Fischer, 1962), p. 58-59 (In German)
- Booklet notes by Robin Golding, 1991 for Daniel Barenboim. Mozart: The Complete Piano Sonatas and Variations, EMI Classics, 8 CD box No. 5 73915 2.
- Mozart CD. 12 Variations “Ah, vous dirai-je, Maman,” K265, etal. Andras Schiff, Piano. Decca Record, London (1988).
Share this article
Joan Sutherland’s Songs CD Notes
Dame Joan Sutherland Sings Compilation of Mom’s Pieces
Share this article
Schubert Complete Piano Trios
Schubert Complete Piano Trios by the former Macquarie Trio (Kathy Selby, piano; Michael Goldschlager, cello; Nicholas Milton, violin)
ABC Classics.
I was organizing my CD collection and spotted this lovely Schubert Piano Trios CD which I had a while back. I’ve enjoyed the former MacTrios performances at Sydney Conservatorium… with all three such strong personalities in their instruments. In particular, I’ve always admired Kathryn Selby’s delivery, emotive, musical fluidity yet never sentimental.
Together, the MacTrio bring drama and lyricism.
The greatest melodist of all time, Franz Schubert, wrote Piano Trio in B-flat D.28 Triosatz at the age of 15. Very young, yes, and yet that’s really halfway to his young life, like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
A haunting and poignant music. Exquisitely performed in the hands of the Macquarie Trio.
Share this article
Review of Two Figaro Operas by Daisy Brambletoes
ON DVD FOR YOUR LISTENING (AND VIEWING) PLEASURE:
Review of Two Figaro Operas
by Daisy Brambletoes
Well folks, I finally got a copy of the two Figaro operas, directed by Jean-Piere Ponnelle, which I have wanted for many years.
Ponnelle is a fine director of opera-on-film, and has filmed both of these operas with meticulously accurate Spanish settings, which I personally find very refreshing, as most productions are made to look French or Italian. As we all know, Beaumarchais was French, Rossini and DaPonte were Italians, and Mozart, naturally, was German – but the setting was always southern Spain. So the two films score very big here. Musically, they are also both excellent productions, and a great deal of fun to listen to. But after that, things become lightly awkward.
Despite the fact that Hermann Prey plays Figaro in both films, the rest of the cast is almost entirely different. They also seem to be set at different moments in time than doesn’t quite juxtapose correctly.
Rossini’s opera is clearly set right at the turn of the century with a few 18th century vestiges, but a mostly early 19th century atmosphere. Add to that, an amusing portrait of Dr.Bartolo looms in the background, which bears a suspicious resemblance to a famous photo of Salvadore Dali. It is fun to watch and listen to, and the humor is as much in the music itself as anything else – a page Rossini borrowed from Mozart’s book, no doubt. But the comedy here is almost on a Chuck Jones level, and at times I also almost felt I was watching Disny’s comedy-adventure classic, “Zorro”. Many visual references are taken from Goya, as well they should be – particularly Don Basilio, the wicked music teacher, who in this production seems to be some kind of alchemist or dark magician, lifted directly from one of Goya’s canvases. (Ponnelle used a similar approach in his film of “Madame Butterfly”, showing Chocho against a painted background of flying black crows, creating the look of classic Noh theater.)
The Mozart film, of course, is Mozart at his almost-best (My favorite Mozart opera is still “Die Zauberflote”). In this film, however, Ponnelle falls back on the old gimmick of allowing music to reflect the thoughts of the characters while they stare at the screen with closed mouths. This may work well for reflective arias like those of the Contessa, but it doesn’t always work. Cherubino simply looks speechless and floundering, f’rinstance, and other scenes visually static despite the musical quality. Presumably we are there for Mozart alone, but this is still a movie, and you still want it to look right. Mind, of course, the clever staging of Figaro’s angry aria in Act Four was quite interesting as Figaro has a musical conversation with himself, and it reminds me of Smeagol vs Gollum in “Lord of the Rings”. All the same, in spite of this minor annoyance, the action flows and sparkles, and it is a very enjoyable production. For once Cherubino looks like a boy, and the characters are all well portrayed.
The real problem, however, is one that will forever haunt these two excellent operas. When Beaumarchais wrote the comedies, they flowed together very sensibly and complimented each other. But we’ve lost something in translation. Mozart’s graceful masterpiece involves serious, thought-provoking characters who are funny because Mozart and the circumstances make them so. Rossini, on the other hand, went for laughs and lots of coloratura & patter, and his characters (many of the same ones in Figaro)are cartoon-like people who are difficult to take seriously.
As brilliant as the two operas are individually, they do not stand comfortably together, and even the skills and efforts of Ponnelle to make them do so miss the mark. You can’t watch them together and feel as if you are watching a great comedy and its natural sequel. They are just too different in too many ways.
Do I recommend these films? Yes, certainly. But there will always be the caviat that despite characters with the same names, we are looking at two completely different sets of people, as if they live in alternate universes.
Do yourself a favor – buy them or rent them, and watch them – but on two different days.
But they’re still fun.



Recent Comments